I'm going to start you with a quote:
Across California, children are bringing home notes warning of dire consequences if Gov. Schwarzenegger’s scorched earth budget is approved – a budget that slashes Proposition 98 public school spending from $42.2 billion this year all the way down to $44.7 billion next year. That should be proof enough that our math programs are suffering.
That's the beginning of an article penned by Senator McClintock, who represents the 19th district in the California Legislature (his website here). In this article, he goes on to itemize funding for a hypothetical school of 180 students with a budget of $1.2 million to get through the year.
I have nitpicks with some of his numbers, but overall I think he's on target. Among his hypothetical suggestions:
There's so much more worth reading. This guy isn't anti-education or anti-teacher, he's anti-teacher's union, and he makes his points with common sense.
He starts his conclusion with this:
The school I have just described is the school we’re paying for. Maybe it’s time to ask why it’s not the school we’re getting.
Mucho thanks to Jay at Sophont for pointing this one out. In fact, he's been very very good lately, and you should just start at the top and scroll on down to see everything.
Posted by Ted at June 9, 2005 11:41 AMgee thankx for the complement.
I got that link via jerrypournelle.com.
He's been doing some intresting writings on education lately.
I happen to work in a NYC public high school, and after thinking about it, there's LOTS that the senator is leaving out. Like does his quoted salary figure include benefits/taxes (typically add 30%), and only 5 teachers is an overcrowded classroom.
I agree that there's a lot not included. No extracurricular activities like sports and clubs, and no mention of feeding (subsidized or otherwise). Still, the premise is right on and makes the point. We spend entirely too much on the educational "experience" and not enough on the education part.
Posted by: Ted at June 10, 2005 04:50 AM