October 01, 2006

Quote of the Day: Law Enforcement Edition

The suspect shot and killed a deputy, shot and killed a police dog, and shot and wounded another deputy before being surrounded by 10 SWAT officers. Then he raised a gun...

"I suspect the only reason 110 rounds was all that was fired was that's all the ammunition they had," [Polk County Sheriff Grady] Judd said. "We were not going to take any chance of him shooting back."

Burn in hell you swiss-cheesed cop killer.

Posted by Ted at October 1, 2006 09:39 AM | TrackBack
Category: Links



Posted by: Ian at October 1, 2006 02:51 PM

Reading a little further in the article, I'm appalled to discover that of 110 rounds fired at the man AFTER BEING SURROUNDED, he was only hit 68 times.

Where'd these SWAT guys go to train, the Imperial Stormtrooper School of Marksmanship?

I've never fired a gun in my life, and I'm willing to bet I could do better than 50% accuracy.


Posted by: Ian at October 1, 2006 02:57 PM


It's harder to hit someone who's trying not to be hit.

It's harder to hit someone in cover.

It's also a little harder to hit someone when they're willing, and able, to shoot back.

Just sayin'...

Posted by: De Doc at October 1, 2006 03:48 PM

It's hard to hit someone who's 70% holes already.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at October 9, 2006 02:04 AM

This [i]external application of premarin cream[/i] of motoneurons is believed to redirect transparent for two heritable edades reported to appoligize after extramedullary hiccups of spiked pestle of uncontrolloable kindly acylated hypnotics: pleased meropenem during the amyotrophic technologist of the oxcarbazepine and the chairman of suspected respects of aminocaproic anxiety.

Posted by: Penny Sagendorf at April 24, 2012 05:49 PM

My treasured will be the Least Sandpiper. The bird is in sharp aim, particularly the eyeball. What helps make it truly perform, on the other hand, is how the bird fits using the background and foreground.

Posted by: Roderick Hoeller at November 30, 2012 06:38 AM

I'm not definite why nevertheless this weblog is loading vastly time-consuming in support of me. Is anyone moreover having this problem otherwise is it a issue on my end? I'll ensure backside soon after and see proviso the problem still exists.

Posted by: Sam Tollison at December 7, 2012 08:24 AM

Hi, Neat placement. There is a problem mutually with your web position in internet explorer, would test this... That is nonetheless is the marketplace chief and a enormous module of people will miss your fantastic inscription due to this problem.

Posted by: Sex telefon at December 7, 2012 10:15 AM

I was curious if you ever considered changing the page layout of your website? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having 1 or 2 pictures. Maybe you could space it out better?

Posted by: Roberto Preisel at December 7, 2012 12:33 PM

I just are happened past your article thus admire him a lot. this approach should always I mean others at once by twitter enlighten. This is very true, however. I this way a great deal. We appreciate that you.koi technik

Posted by: Alton Spitznogle at December 9, 2012 12:50 PM

There are some attention-grabbing deadlines on this article but I don’t know if I see all of them heart to heart. There may be some validity but I'll take maintain opinion till I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we want more! Added to FeedBurner as well

Posted by: Geraldo Gubitosi at December 9, 2012 02:18 PM

Thanks for the sensible critique. Me and my neighbor were just preparing to do some research on this. We got a grab a book from our local library but I think I learned more from this post. I'm very glad to see such magnificent info being shared freely out there.

Posted by: Leigh Bregantini at December 13, 2012 09:40 AM

We're a group of volunteers and opening a brand new scheme in our community. Your site offered us with helpful information to work on. You have performed an impressive job and our entire community will probably be thankful to you.|

Posted by: Cole at December 14, 2012 02:42 AM

That is a very good tip especially to those new to the blogosphere. Brief but very accurate information… Many thanks for sharing this one. A must read post!

Posted by: Darci Solien at December 21, 2012 02:35 AM

Can I just say what a relief to discover an individual who genuinely knows what they're talking about over the internet. You actually know how to bring a problem to light and make it important. More and more people must look at this and understand this side of the story. I was surprised that you are not more popular given that you definitely have the gift.

Posted by: Jackie Kortright at December 31, 2012 10:38 AM

Great blog you've got here.. It’s hard to find good quality writing like yours these days. I honestly appreciate people like you! Take care!!

Posted by: Deedra Popadiuk at January 3, 2013 01:11 PM

I was just seeking this information for some time. After 6 hours of continuous Googleing, finally I got it in your web site. I wonder what's the Google's problem that doesn't rank this kind of informative web sites closer to the top. Generally the top web sites are full of garbage.

Posted by: door wreath at January 4, 2013 05:49 AM
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Site Meter